Sign into an existing account

I live in a wooded area with a wonderful diversity of birds. Cardinals, bluejays, bluebirds, juncos, woodpeckers and more. My girl gave me some bird seed for Christmas that I put on a rock out front. Since then I've enjoyed watching them very much. Recently however, the nigger birds (blackbirds) have invaded, eat all the food and sheit everywhere. LOL No I'm serious. Just like humans the nigger birds are a fucking plague. Ugly as fuck and just make shit. I think I'm going to get a BB gun. This is going to be better than I ever imagined. 😂😂😂

Since @HeyJames communicated that he was too retarded to understand how the Internet works, I figured we needed to explain basic 1st grade level Voat skills to him.

Now that faggot can stop crying to us about not having archive links. Finally.

https://files.catbox.moe/o5nk66.png
In 1930 there were less than 10 million jews in Europe. 500k in germany.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/us-defense-secretary-pete-hegseth-identity-months-dead-dod

After multiple US federal government agencies required employees to remove gender-identifying pronouns from email signatures on Friday evening, the Defense Department issued a memo titled "Identity Months Dead at DoD." The move is part of the Trump administration's broader effort to remove toxic cultural Marxists from managerial roles across the federal gov't and military.

Like this...

New guidance from US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth revealed the following: "Identity Months Dead at DoD." 


He continued: 

"**Our unity and purpose are instrumental to meeting the Department's warfighting mission. Efforts to divide the force – to put one group ahead of another – erode camaraderie and threaten mission execution." 

What's key in Hegseth's directive is "Efforts to divide the force"... 

Cultural Marxists hide under the guise of 'social justice warriors.' They have reintroduced racism, created privileged classes, and controlled speech across government, the military, and houses of worship. Their goal is simple: dismantle the foundations of America and push for a socialist reconstruction. 

Sex, sexual orientation, climate, and other ways to divide people have been used by cultural Marxists to advance revolutionary goals. 

On Wednesday, Hegseth told Fox News that "one of the dumbest phrases in military history is 'our diversity is our strength.'"

"Our diversity is not our strength," Hegseth said, adding, "Our unity and our shared purpose is our strength."

He noted, "We will be merit-based and color blind." 

Hegseth is correct. Unity is strength, and far too long, especially beginning under the Obama years and supercharged under Biden; the nation has been divided by Marxists based on sex, gender, "oppressed vs. oppressor," and all other non-sense developed in far-left colleges that will come to an end under the Trump administration.

Hegseth noted in the memo:

Installations, units, and offices are encouraged to celebrate the valor and success of military heroes of all races, genders, and backgrounds as we restore our warrior culture and ethos. We are proud of our warriors and their history, but we will focus on the character of their service instead of their immutable characteristics.

News flash*: China and Russia aren't dividing their nations and hindering their warfighting capabilities as the world has crept closer to World War III.

I asked ChatGPT how many jews were in the holobunga camps when they were liberated using the number of survivors alive today as a reference point. Naturally I didn't state it like that. tl;dr, ChatGPT estimates there were 4.9 Million jews liberated from the camps. Here's the details:

Me:
An event happened 80 years ago. There are 245,000 people alive today that were participating in that event. How many people can we estimate to have participated in the original event 80 years ago? Include all ages. We can assume they are average Europeans for the purpose of life expectancy. Explain your answer including assumptions.

ChatGPT said:
To estimate the number of participants in the event that took place 80 years ago, we need to account for survival rates over time based on life expectancy. Since we assume the participants were average Europeans, we will use European life expectancy data to guide our calculations.

Step 1: Understanding Mortality Rates
The average life expectancy in Europe today is around 78–82 years.
Life expectancy in the early 20th century was lower, but for simplicity, we'll assume that at the time of the event, participants had a similar long-term survival pattern.
Mortality rates increase with age, so younger participants in the event would have had a better chance of surviving to today.
Step 2: Survival Rates by Age Group
We assume the participants in the event were a mix of ages, from infants to elderly individuals. Using life tables (mortality rates per age group), a rough estimate of survival rates to today (from 80 years ago) can be made:

Age in Event Survival Rate to Today (%)
0 (newborns) ~3%
10 years ~6%
20 years ~10%
30 years ~20%
40 years ~12%
50 years ~5%
60+ years ~1% or lower
The survival rates are lower for older participants at the time of the event, with most centenarians today having been very young at the time.

Step 3: Backward Estimation
If 245,000 people from the original event are still alive today, we work backward by estimating what percentage of participants survived.

A reasonable weighted average survival rate across all age groups would be around 5–10%, considering that a large portion of the original population consisted of young and middle-aged adults.

Using this assumption:

Original Participants
≈
Current Survivors
Survival Rate
Original Participants≈
Survival Rate
Current Survivors
​

Using a 7% survival rate as a reasonable midrange estimate:

245
,
000
0.07
≈
3.5
 million participants
0.07
245,000
​
≈3.5 million participants
Final Estimate
Thus, we estimate that about 3 to 4 million people originally participated in the event 80 years ago.

Key Assumptions
Participants were of average European life expectancy.
Survival rates are derived from historical and modern life tables.
A weighted average survival rate of 7% was used, balancing younger and older age groups.
The event had participants of all ages, but younger individuals were more likely to survive to today.
Would you like a more precise breakdown or alternative calculations?

Me:
5% survival rate for 50 year olds is unreasonable they would be 130 years old! Also 12% survival rate for 40 year olds is unreasonable. They would be 120 years old! Please reconsider your survival rate estimates.

ChatGPT said:
You're absolutely right—my initial survival rate estimates for older participants were too high. Let's refine the analysis with more realistic assumptions based on mortality data.

Revised Survival Rate Estimations
We will assume that:

Participants were of all ages, from infants to elderly.
European life expectancy trends apply.
Survival rates decline significantly with age.
A reasonable survival rate for different age groups at the time of the event (80 years ago):

Age in Event Survival Rate to Today (%) Current Age
0 (newborns) ~5–7% 80
10 years old ~10–15% 90
20 years old ~6–8% 100
30 years old ~2–3% 110
40 years old ~0.5% 120
50+ years old Effectively 0% 130+
People who were 50 or older at the event (now 130+) are essentially non-existent today.
Those who were 40 at the time (~120 today) have near-zero survival.
The vast majority of living participants today were likely children, teenagers, or young adults at the time.
Step 2: Backward Estimation
We now assume that 245,000 people alive today primarily come from age groups that had reasonable survival rates.

Weighted Average Survival Rate
Most of today's survivors were likely between 0–30 years old at the time. Let’s take an overall survival rate of ~5%, assuming that:

Children (0–10) had the highest survival (7–10%).
Young adults (20s) had moderate survival (6–8%).
Older adults (30+) had much lower survival (~2% or less).
Revised Calculation
Original Participants
≈
Current Survivors
Survival Rate
Original Participants≈
Survival Rate
Current Survivors
​

Using an overall survival rate of 5%:

245
,
000
0.05
=
4.9
 million participants
0.05
245,000
​
=4.9 million participants
Final Estimate
We estimate that around 4.5 to 5.5 million people originally participated in the event.

This range is based on:

Realistic survival rates considering age at the time.
The fact that most of today's survivors were young at the time.
A weighted survival rate of ~5%.
Would you like further refinements or considerations?

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/top-doj-official-resigns-after-attempted-reassignment-5802046

Corey Amundson had worked for the U.S. Department of Justice for 23 years.

The man who led the U.S. Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section has resigned, according to a new letter.

Corey Amundson, who had been in charge of the section for years before the Trump administration recently reassigned him to work on immigration issues, has stepped down.

“I am honored and blessed to have served our country and this department for the last 23 years,” Amundson wrote in his letter to Acting Attorney General James McHenry.

Story continues below advertisement


!

“I spent my entire professional life committed to the apolitical enforcement of the federal criminal law and to ensuring that those around me understood and embraced that central tenet of our work.”

The Department of Justice (DOJ) did not respond to a request for comment.

Amundson started working for the DOJ out of Louisiana in 2002, according to his LinkedIn profile. He shifted to Washington about 10 years ago.

Related Stories



The profile lists his experience with the DOJ as ending in 2025.

Amundson was tapped in 2019 during Trump’s first term to become chief of the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section. That put him in charge of overseeing public corruption and other politically sensitive investigations.

Story continues below advertisement


!

Amundson is one of an estimated 20 career officials inside the DOJ to be reassigned to a new Sanctuary City Working Group inside the associate attorney general’s office.

At least two of those officials, Amundson and George Toscas from the National Security Division, had some involvement in the two criminal investigations against Trump.

Former special counsel Jack Smith said in his final report that his team “consulted regularly” with the Public Integrity Section on topics such as serving subpoenas, bringing election fraud charges, and a U.S. Constitution clause that provides immunity to members of Congress who are furthering legislative acts.

Amundson’s resignation letter did not make reference to his section’s role in the Trump cases.

Story continues below advertisement


!

However, it cited a number of other high-profile cases he helped oversee, including the public corruption cases against Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), former Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.), and Fugees hip hop group member Prakazrel Michel.

The DOJ, in addition to the recent reassignments, recently fired a number of officials who worked on Smith’s team.

The reassignments and terminations have drawn scrutiny from Democrats, who expressed concern about the treatment of individuals they said were “excellent career prosecutors.”

The moves contradicted Trump’s “repeated pledges to maintain a merit-based system for government employment,” Reps. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) and Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) said in a letter to DOJ officials.

Story continues below advertisement


!

“By removing them from their positions in this hasty and unprincipled way, you have very likely violated longstanding federal laws,” they added later.

The DOJ has not responded to an inquiry about the letter.

Jacob Burg and Reuters contributed to this report.